Header
spacer
spacer Blog Top
  spacer

« Palm Sunday: Black Jesus | Main | Maundy Thursday: Sacrament on the Loose »

Obama’s Advantage?

Barack_Obama_01_by_StudioFovea.jpg

Today was an important day in Barak Obama’s candidacy, and perhaps even in our nation’s collective conversation about race. Over the last week or so, the buzz has been all about the topic of race. Former VP candidate Geraldine Ferraro, who was Walter Mondale’s running mate in 1984 and who works for Clinton now, said that Obama wouldn’t even be here if he wasn’t Black.

Of course not. After all, he wouldn’t be who he is if he wasn’t Black. Hillary Clinton wouldn’t be who she is if she weren’t a woman. I wouldn’t be who I am if I weren’t a white man. But Ferraro was suggesting something more: that we’re only taking him seriously as a candidate because he is Black.

Does being Black actually give Obama an unearned advantage in electoral politics? Ferraro thinks so. If so, one must wonder why there have only been 3 Black senators and 2 Black governors in the 125 years since Blacks have been allowed to run for office in the US. It seems strange to suddenly suggest that blackness is a benefit when running for national office.

But if Ferraro got things started, Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright, really drew the attention of newspapers and talk radio this week for some very strong comments about racial animosity in America.

People who are opposed to Obama’s campaign have been trying to say, in effect; “If Pastor Wright’s radical views give us any indication of how Obama looks at the question of race, then far from bringing hope for racial healing in the US, an Obama presidency would drive a much deeper wedge between Blacks and rest of America.”

So today, after many months of saying that this campaign is not about race, and that he is just a qualified leader who happens to be Black, Obama gave what is considered a major speech about the issue (which you can see here). He has to be very careful, because it is such a delicate matter. And regardless of whether he agrees or disagrees with his pastor, Jeremiah Wright is a dear friend who led him to Christ, married he and Michelle, and baptized their children.

See the text of the entire speech below. Read or watch it yourself, and decide what you think.

Jeff Johnsen
is executive director of Mile High Ministries in Denver, Colorado.
couldn’t have placed Kenya on a map 10 years ago.
serves on the board of Tumaini, a home for orphans in Kenya
Today, many Kenyans are like family to the Johnsens
Their goodness draws him close to God

Obama Speech given March 18, 2008

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a
Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign – to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together – unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction – towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners – an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary.

The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at
Trinity:

“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America –to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.
Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments – meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families – a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews.
The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.

Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation.
Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news.

We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the
American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today – a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”

“I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Comments (9)

If there has been a more substantive speech in the last forty years by a national political figure in America, I can't think of it.

Lori Ventola:

I am stunned. I am sorry for ever saying this man is "just a suit." I am afraid to believe that this kind of thought might be real and not just a particularly brilliant move in the political game.

Tom wildenberg:

It may be a moving speech but I still can't figure out why someone would continue to attend and support a church whose leader espouses such hatred and bigotry. Is it really enough to, (after you are caught so to speak), acknowledge your disagreement with a persons words and actions yet continue to support and encourage them by your actions (attendance at church and financial support)? Seems a bit disingenuous, maybe even deceptive. In addition, pastor Wright is also a supporter of Louis Farrakan who is anti-semitic and purveyor of much hatred and spews divisive and hate filled rhetoric. Not my idea of great company for the leader of our country nor great company of a brother in Christ. Speeches are great, but what matters more is the character and principles that constitute a person. Words don't make a man, beliefs and actions do. I still don't know what Obama believes as his words and actions seem to contradict. That to me is very disturbing and concerning. He is obviously very intelligent, passionate and charismatic. All potentially good qualities. However, intelligence, charisma and passion without principles and charcter is very dangerous. When you lift the veil on Obama what lies behind it? I don't think we know. It seems more facts need to be examined, not more words read or heard. Many moving speeches have been given by many people that have done terrible things. Let's not get lost in the words and caught up in the empty furor. Let's dig a little deeper. Just the facts please.

Jeff Johnsen:

Tom, this afternoon I heard Martin Marty, a white, Lutheran, professor of religion from University of Chicago, say that his friend Jeremiah Wright loves his country deeply. Marty compared Wright to the prophet Jeremiah, whose often caustic, and even bizarre, demonstrations against his country got him into terrible trouble with his contemporaries. It was precisely Jeremiah's love of country that broke his heart, and drove him to preach such a bitter message.
Marty suggested that it's very difficult for those of us who are born and raised in the categories on top of the social order historically to fully appreciate the prophetic voice of the Black church -- a voice forged in suffering and the battle against oppression.
Marty's perspective is helpful, but I thought that Obama himself did a masterful job of interpreting the perspective of his pastor and others in the Civil Rights generation, and of suggesting that while there is still much work to be done to "perfect our union," things look much different for a younger generation of Black leaders.

Tad Monroe:

Tom, if you want "just the facts" then please back up with concrete examples how Obama's words and his actions don't match up?

I don't agree with everything my wife believes or says but that doesn't mean I'm going to divorce her.

I certainly don't believe or agree with everything my pastors have said or pastors I currently work with but that doesn't me I would leave their church or not work with them. As a pastor, I certainly don't think people in my church must agree with everything I say.

I was cared for by a man who is a pastor who took me into his home when I was a boy. At this point in my life, this man and I have very different churches and many differing theological opinions. But, this man has loved me well, served me well, and continued to support me; no matter what. I would sit in his church any day, even though I don't always agree with him. His actions speak and have spoken louder then his thoughts and ideas that I can disagree with at times. You are right, his actions, similar to Wright's in Obama's life I suspect, have spoken louder than his thoughts and ideas.

Personally, I don't disagree with all of what Jeremiah Wright said. I think we should spend more time in America examining whether God would and should damn us for our actions and less time singing God Bless America blindly. America has made an art of not "living out" what we espouse. That is a fact.

We also must remember that Jesus was not NICE. Christian and NICE are not synonyms. Jesus was prophetic, divisive, and unpopular with the mainstream religious people of his time. Jeremiah Wright might be in good company afterall.

Still, we are missing the point. This speech was the most honest and profound public discourse on race in a long time, I don't think I exagerate when I say it was truly profound and historic.

Anonymous:

Tad,
Thanks for sharing your views. I really enjoy your many contributions to Geography of Grace. So thank you. You are a very gifted writer yourself. I would wager that if your posts were not a result of your deep and genuine beliefs and supported by corresponding actions those poignant words would ring quite hollow. I also think my point must not have been made well. A simple disagreement would not or should not be reason enough to leave or "divorce" someone;(God hates divorce but I don't recall him "hating" a decision to leave one church for another based on a disagreement with beliefs or values; e.g. divorce is much more serious)and I don't recall saying that. What I said was Obama didn't seem to indicate any issues with the rhetoric coming from Jeremiah Wright until it seemingly caused him some difficulty. That doesn't seem to me to be genuine.
My main point however was that words and speeches may be quite moving and may (like music and song)stir many deep seeded emotions, but what REALLY matters is not emotion filled words but beliefs and actions, character and principles. Emotions are tremendously unreliable and fleeting. I also said intelligence, passion and charisma without principles and character is very dangerous and that many moving speeches have come from people that have done terrible things. So we shouldn't rely so much on gilded speech as we should on beliefs, principles and charcter that have been evidenced by action. For example, I keep hearing the "change " mantra from Obama that so many people are willing to rally around with no idea of what is being changed,how and to what (what actions). That to me is very disturbing. A very hollow message. How do we know if change for change sake is beneficial or harmful? It is much easier to criticize incumbents or people that have taken a delineated position than to articulate a detailed plan for change (i.e. vs. citing platitudes)as he has done with Hillary.
I also was confused by your Christian "nice" comment. I never mentioned nice in my note. So help me out. I also take a very big exception to your all encompassing point that "America has made an art of not living out what we espouse. That is a fact." Although you can make a case on an individual level I think your statement on such a grand level is very tenuous. Every instituion run by human beings starts from a default "fallen" postion and will fall well short of God's standards in each and every case. But I challenge you to find a better man-made governmental structure in the world at this time(a point we could no doubt vigorously debate for many moons!!). I would not disagree that we are challenged to find people of character, principles and belief in God these days, which is very different than what we were blessed with early in our history as a country where the founding fathers (still fallen and sinners) were willing to sacrifice (actions) all they had for a cause they believed was sanctioned by our Lord. But is that surprising?
We can agree or disagree on whether or not Obama's speech was the most honest(???) and profound public discourse on race in a long time (see any of Martin Luther King Jr.'s speeches not so very long ago, which by the way were backed up by his profound and historic actions), but I would say so what?? What is more important than a flowery speech is what is at the guts of the man. I said, I don't think we know. But before we attempt to elect him president, I think it would behoove us to find out.

Tad Monroe:

Tom,

Obviously, marriage and church membership are not the same level of commitment depending on how you look at it. But, I think the point is obvious; there are things and people that I am deeply committed to even though they say and do things that at times I disagree with or am dissapointed with. To a lesser degree, there are times I agree with much of what someone is saying, but perhaps I would choose to say it differently, not so much a problem with the message, but the medium.

Obama did not address Rev. Wright's sermons becasue no one had brought them up? They were old sermons, surfaced I'm sure by political adversaries to try to disparage him. He wouldn't and didn't do the political thing (which would have been to distance himself), rahter he did the authentic and honest thing. He said, I don't necessarily agree with all of what Rev. Wright said or how he said it but refused to disown him, his heritage, or the truth of what that man and that faith community has meant to him.

I've this argument about Obama's "empty rhetoric" from you and everyone else. I'm sorry, but I don't see it. Obama says just as much as any other poltician on either side about the specifics of policy. I've researched it. In my opinion when it comes to leadership the most important things are the ability to articulate and motivate, character and commitment, and the ability to articulate a philosophy, theology, and worldview that I believe in. If you can articulate a reasonable, hopeful, just, and humble worldview; the details will follow suit. I don't need my president to be a manager of legislation, I need them to create a worldview, an ethos, a philosopy, and values that I can believe in. All of them can talk policy, Obama is the only one that can paint a picture of a country and world that actually seems to resemble the Kingdom of God in some way; loving and talking to your enemies. Caring for the pooer and the marginalized. Empowering people that have never been empowered. Etc...I believe he has shown incredible character and poise in refusing to go negative and not folding to the political pressure to deny and/or leave behind those that have loved and supported him, even when they become a political liability.

The NICE comment is probably less related to your comments specifically and more to the "white fear" response of many Americans to Wright's words. See Jeff's comments about understanding the black prohetic voice in its context. The prophetic word is alarming!

As a history major and avid reader, I've found many governments that in there own ways have been as just or more so than America. There are many wonderful things about our way of life, perhaps it is even "the best", (lets say it is for arguments sake) but that is not an excuse to not critique our irresponsibility and the violence we have done and that our way of life does to the rest of the world every day. I fear we are coming from different places on this. I'd say many Social Democracies are much closer to what I believe Christ has called us to. We don't even have universal healthcare?

I can not disagree more with the common belief that the "beliefs" of our forefathers were orthodox Christain, particularly biblical, or really that consistent with the bulk of Christian history to that point. I have studied this and found this to be one of the biggest misconceptions that our Evangelical Christian culture promotes. We have never been a truly Christian nation, we are not the New Jerusalem, and we've used this doctrine (Manifest Destiny) to take by force and blood what we believed to be ours, in God's name.

Dr. King is one of my heros. His legacy and work will always be with us and continues to speak. However, as a 33 year old, that was before my time and many in my generation. That was 40 years ago, close to a half a century, and we are still so far from the DREAM. We've made progress but ask black America if its been enough? I'm glad you brought up Dr. King. He was an amazing communicator and man of action. The reality is that it was his ability to communicate and mobilize throught that communication; to articulate a differing way of seeing things, a different way of living, not so much in policy specifics and details but by helping people BELIEVE and have HOPE. So much so that they acted and changed some things. With Dr. King we must also remember that parable of Jesus, "the wheat and the weeds grow together". Dr. King said many things and did many things. He had great character in many things and yet he did not have great character when it came to keeping his wedding vows? Does that dismiss and change what he did? In Obama there is also, wheat and weeds. The charachter and action argument, short of Jesus himself, always leaves us wanting and dissapointed.

Thank you Tom, for the spirited debate and for your thoughts and comments related to my contributions to the sight. I am grateful and appreciative of your encouragement. My actions are not consisistent with my words. My words (I pray) will always give voice to my failure, my need of Grace, my longing for something more, different, and new. My words help me speak and articulate something I can only dare dream about. They make it possible to dare to imagine things differnt. My words and my actions sometimes by the Grace of God find themselves in sychronisty. However, I fear like greater poets than I, I'll be relagated as a dreamer, as naive, as a lunatic, and I'm sure given that I'm a preacher; I'll be called a hypocrite! But as the Irish like to joke about Purgatory, "at least I'll be with friends".

EXCELLENT POST! And great discussion too. It's nice to read differing opinions without the mud slinging I've seen regarding politics, religion, etc. I am deeply moved and will be posting a link to this on my blog. Thank you.

Vince Trujillo:

I thought Obama speech was profoundly insightful. I found myself moved by how he challenged all of us to look at how we may or may not help the problem of us coming together. Not that he makes it easy to do, but that we each have a part to play in it. That we each carry in our stories, promises and problems, that have contributed to how we view our country. He did a great job of painting the struggles of some of theses races and how they might view our society.
I also think that Obama did a great job of addressing the remarks of his pastor, by saying he did not agree with what he said and many other things that he has heard before, but he also acknowledged the many great things that his pastor has done for him and his community too. Let's be honest, we work, we live, we attend, we have friends and family that say the most unbelievable, untrue, even sometimes racist things that we shake our head too, sometimes we our the ones that are saying these things too. It's not that we agree with that person says, but most of the time we know that somehow their words were shaped by their story, not that it makes those words true, but their words are misguided views of their story. If we judged everyone on their words, we would all be alone. I am sure when I have preached that their have been people who have cringed at what I said, sometimes that is good because we don't always want to go with the status quo, but sometimes we say things that our purely our opinion. Obama's speech was not the status quo of fake harmony, but a challenge for all of us to look not just at others faults or others words of racism, but to look at our own hearts. He challenged us to remove the victim mentality and seek action by confronting problems that we feel motivated to fight.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

spacer
  Bottom
  spacer
Footer